Posts Tagged ‘United Nations’

Book Review: A Thousand Splendid Suns

Thursday, November 19th, 2009

First, I have to contradict something that I wrote a few days ago. If you read my entry from this past Sunday, I commented on how sometimes it takes me a year to get through a single book due to problems with timing. That wasn’t the case with Khaled Hosseini’s A Thousand Splendid Suns. I began reading this book about a week ago and I couldn’t put it down; I had the whole thing completed in about four days.

I had no idea what to expect coming into this book. A few years ago I read Khaled Hosseini’s The Kite Runner and I enjoyed his writing style. So, based on being pleased with the other book, I picked up A Thousand Splendid Suns and let me tell you – this is one hell of a story! It’s the story of two women in Afghanistan and their struggles for respect and the ability to live a decent life in a country that is seemingly in a constant state of war. The novel is brilliantly written and is at times both heart-wrenching and brutal. At some point in the novel, the reader is actually pressed to expect the worst outcome for these women in any pending situation. Hosseini captures despair unlike any other writer that I’ve read in the last few years.

The story’s two main female characters are Mariam and Laila. The two women are separated by a number of years, but they wind up as wives to a hardcore man who beats and humiliates them. It’s tough to read at some points, but the quality of the writing makes it worth the intensity. Though these two are wives to the same man, their histories are anything but similar. Mariam grows up as the unwanted child of a wealthy man who conceived her with a servant woman. Being of such a history, Mariam is cast aside and literally lives in a hut until her mother passes away (the story kicks into high gear at this point, but I won’t spoil it for you). Mariam is then sent off to marry a man name Rasheed who requires her to follow a strict Islamic lifestyle, which includes wearing a burqa and being subservient to her husband.

Laila, on the other hand, grows up across the street from Mariam and Rasheed. Her father is a university professor before the Soviets begin to occupy the country. As a professor, he stresses the importance of Laila getting an education which ultimately brings Laila’s life full circle (you need to get to the end of the book to understand that piece of the story). Laila grows up with a young boy named Tariq. The two of them share a budding love story until the war gets so bad that Tariq’s family is forced to leave Kabul (which is where the bulk of the story takes place). From that point, the story take a variety of twists and turns.

After her family is killed, Laila winds up as Rasheed’s second wife. One of the most well written parts of the book is when Laila gets beaten for the first time by Rasheed. It really puts the reader in a position to hate Rasheed, which is where I found myself about midway through the book.

The rest of the story deals with Laila’s children, her desire to preserve what she had with Tariq, and Mariam wanting her life to mean something of importance (which it ultimately does). Of course, there’s a lot more to this story to fill its 415 pages and I encourage you to read the novel to get a full picture of this wonderfully written story.

In an Afterword, Hosseini asks his readers to look at the United Nations website regarding refugee services and support. Feel free to click on that link to see the website. And, if you’re looking for a startlingly powerful and brilliantly written read, then I suggest picking up A Thousand Splendid Suns.

The UN Security Council

Saturday, February 8th, 2003

Here we go. Thanks to Eddie for helping me as I decided which topic that I wanted to cover in this latest edition of the Babblings. I’ve decided to let the relevancy and power of the United Nations Security Council be the latest topic that gets the brief looking over from the eyes of the Balrog and his lair.

Let’s see what we have here, folks. The UN Security Council (UNSC) is composed of 15 members, of which there are 5 constant mainstays. These are the 5 that I would like to take a slight look at, but to be more honest – I’d like to look at one in particular before commenting on the relevancy of the UNSC. Let’s take a look at our friends, The French.

French President Jacques Chirac has gone on record numerous times telling the world that he will not agree to go into a military agreement to disarm Iraq and that creating a war isn’t the answer to this situation. Now, regardless of whether you’re a by-the-book conservative or a bleeding-heart liberal, there are some points here that we should be able to agree upon. First and foremost, the French have a skewed view of the reality of the situation. I don’t know if many of you know this, but France is the largest importer of Iraqi oil in the world. In the world folks! They don’t get a small percent of their oil from Iraq like we do or like England does – Iraq is their number one buyer. Second, France has a large economic plan with the Iraqi government that is worth billions and billions of dollars.

With these two facts, I think that we should all be able to agree that the French might have a slightly different outlook on this situation then say…Australia. That’s just a result of the facts.

Now that that has been established, let’s briefly go over how the UNSC works. Of the fifteen members on this council, 5 have a clause called the veto. This works just like our Presidential veto and most gubernatorial vetoes in that if they don’t like the decision of the council, they can simply say “no” and the council is not allowed to move forward with their plan.

Does anyone else see the flaw in the logistics of this setup? Yes, I realize that for something as drastic as war to be declared, it would be best for what is basically the world’s governing war body (the UNSC) to agree 110%, but look at the situation here, folks. Of the five main members of the UNSC, one is definitely not going to vote for war no matter what evidence is shown. If every country in the world agreed that Saddam Hussein is committing acts of disgust against humanity and amassing weapons of mass destruction, but the French still do not agree, then they can use this veto power and prevent a regime change (happy term for war) with Iraq. Is this not asinine?

Yes, I know that if the entire world actually agreed and France didn’t, we’d still go to war, but it’s the logistics of the situation. I’m not saying that there shouldn’t be a 5 country permanent member base on the UNSC, but I AM saying that maybe the French aren’t deserving of a place on that elite board. It’s no surprise to the world that France has lost much of its world power in the past 60 – 100 years. This is to be expected. You see after all of the conquests into the New World and the chartering of colonies in Africa and what not, I think it would be safe to say (and the evidence shows) that Europe was exhausted! So now that World Wars are becoming a thing of the past (one good part of the UN), the old world powers are no longer such. Today’s power is defined as technological advances, monetary power, and political bipartisanship. Today’s power is defined as America, Britain, the emerging Democratic Russia, and I’ll even go so far as to say the technological mastery of the Germans and the computer-based brilliance of the Japanese.

Today’s power is not defined with the French anymore.

So let’s look at the relevancy of the UNSC for a quick moment. Here you have a group with awesome intentions – to unite the world in a peaceful manner and remove tyrants from positions of power. How great of a plan is that?!? But, the framers of the UN Charter didn’t seem to take into account the fact that there might have been a member of the UNSC that would sway against obvious facts. So I ask you, good people out there – is the UNSC a relevant organization in today’s world if one member of the group would stand against a war to remove a tyrant for their own economic goals? Think about it.

Don’t take into account what the other UNSC members think. As a matter of fact, you can even forget all of the stuff that I put out there against the French with their economy relying heavily on Iraq. And you can even forget about what the latest news reports tell us (that Iraq is busy working on shredding old invoices from French chemical companies). Just think about this: Is the decision of a single country enough to allow a tyrant to stay in power? For those of you who are against the removal of Saddam, I would try to ask you the opposite question, but it has to be reworded to reflect fact. So I ask you: Is the decision of the United Nations Security Council enough to allow a regime change in Iraq?

My thoughts are simple – 1) France needs to be re-evaluated as a country with a permanent place on the security council due to its irrelevance as a world power in today’s society, 2) if France disagrees and successfully averts a regime change with their economic partner, Iraq, while the facts show a different story, the United Nations has rendered themselves irrelevant.

Send me some feedback. You know I get more e-mails from these political articles than anything else I’ve ever written on TBL! I LOVE hearing your varying opinions on these issues. So take care folks and remember that YOUR opinion DOES matter!

(Originally published as a Balrog Babblings article)


© 1996 - 2010 Usable Web Solutions, LLC
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

All content is exclusive to this site and may be reprinted only with express written permission of the Owner of this site.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us