Posts Tagged ‘Vote’

Going All Absentee Ballot, All The Time

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

You may remember that after the November 2008 general election, I wrote an entry talking about how I was considering using absentee balloting all of the time for the foreseeable future. Well, earlier this week I signed up for the Civilian Absentee Ballot program where I’ll receive an absentee ballot for all general elections until I ask for otherwise.

It’s not that I don’t like the whole voting booth experience, it’s that it is very hard (and expensive) for someone who rents in one part of the state to travel to another part of the state to cast a single vote. Plus, add in the fact that I generally have to go to work on Election Day and you get a real problem in terms of traveling logistics. If there is an option available to cast an absentee ballot in place of making the trip and having to juggle a ridiculous schedule, then why not take it?

For those of you who are registered in Morris County and looking to have an absentee ballot sent to you instead of having to go to the polls, feel free to click here to download the very easy to fill out, one page application. I think that the Civilian Absentee Ballot is a great option to get more people voting more consistently.

Can You Believe Susan Boyle Lost BGT?

Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009

Talk about all of the upset victories in the history of entertainment/reality television! Worldwide phenomenon and internet superstar Susan Boyle lost the Britain’s Got Talent reality entertainment program over the weekend. What a shame?! And what’s worse – she lost to a dance troupe who, if they’re not forgotten already, will be forgotten by next week.

A dance troupe!

I’m not sure how the voting is conducted by Britain’s Got Talent, but I think I read somewhere that there are ten finalists and they are all voted on by the public. I have to imagine that if the show pitted Susan Boyle against any of the other nine finalists in a head-to-head showdown, she would win the vote hands down. Having potential votes siphoned off by eight other acts is tough on any contestant in any competition.

After Susan Boyle lost the competition, she reportedly hollered that she hated Britain’s Got Talent as she went back to her dressing room. Worse yet, she checked herself into a hospital as she was suffering from extreme exhaustion. Frankly, I blame the tabloid media in Britain as they tried to paint her as a monster after she blew up earlier in the week letting off a few four-letter words. The poor woman – who gives a shit if she told someone to fuck off? ;-) The woman was tired and overexposed by the very media that then had the gall to call her overexposed!

Regardless of her loss on Britain’s Got Talent, expect big things coming for Susan Boyle. She has a raw talent that, once refined, will make her a good living in the European theater scene for the rest of her life. And besides, while she may not have won Britain’s Got Talent, she certain won the hearts and minds of the world-at-large and, most importantly in terms of marketability, she won over the internet crowd.

Building a Third Party Base at the Local Level

Saturday, November 15th, 2008

Over the last few days I’ve posted some information about a third party in the 2008 election – the Constitution Party. I’m just putting this information out there because I really believe that third parties are railroaded by the mainstream media and that America needs a strong third party to challenge the Democrats and Republicans. But as I look at these parties, I begin to wonder why they don’t start smaller and use more aggressive tactics.

For example, I’ve been looking at the voter results in my hometown of Mount Arlington (obsessively so). The Constitution Party received 2 votes in my hometown out of a total of 2,536 votes case. Repeat: they received 2 votes. Honestly, that’s not too bad! Mount Arlington isn’t too big and for a third party to pull any votes is impressive. Write-ins received 14 votes, Ralph Nader had 13, the Libertarians had 5 votes, the list goes on. In total, third parties received 41 votes or 1.6% of the vote.

Again, that’s not totally bad in this type of election, but if the third parties want to do better then they should be building a stronger base at the local level. For example, there were 4,387 votes cast for the Mount Arlington Borough Council (you get to cast two votes, which means a total of 5,072 votes could have been cast – some voters obviously chose not to vote for Borough Council or only cast one vote). I have to imagine that if a third party really wants to make an impact, they would spend a good deal of time and money at the lowest level of government and try to win these smaller elections. You win the local election for Mayor or Town Council or whatever, prove that your policies work at the local level, then try to expand to other local municipalities or to the county level (depending where you are in the United States).

The Republicans won in Mount Arlington and from what I can see, they’ve done a fine job of leading. They were handed the short end of the stick thanks to Governor Money Bags’ new anti-small town policies, but they’re managing. That said, their leading candidate received 24.34% of the votes cast. A third party should be able to meet that percentage if they wage a good campaign.

Or maybe there are other reasons why third parties aren’t making it in America. If I were running a third party, I’d choose a few small towns across America and use them as examples for why my party should be elected to higher offices. Hell, I’d even look at taking in disenfranchised members of the Republicans or Democrats and use them as the candidates for my party! Why not use those folks who already have name recognition and some type of rapport with the public?

But I would do more. I would hold voter registration drives and be sure to get those people who have never registered or never thought of registering. Go door to door if necessary and have unregistered voters fill out a voter registration form at the same time as they fill out an absentee ballot request. Put them on that perpetual absentee ballot program and tell them that it means they can literally vote from home – so long as they drop the ballot in the mail in time. If it’s legal (and I don’t know if it is), drop them some simple, uncomplicated campaign propaganda. Get them a button or a bumper sticker or something.

It just seems to me that third parties aren’t utilizing these very simple tactics in order to take a foothold at the smallest levels of American society. Again, maybe they are doing these things in places other than New Jersey and I don’t see it, but I have to think that third parties could be doing a better job of getting the word out about their existence and their platforms.

“For the Good of the Party”

Tuesday, July 6th, 2004

I post a lot on the message boards for my undergraduate fraternity (which I also advise as their Chapter Director). One of the conversations that was bound to come up on those boards was about the Presidential race. Now, I’m not going to go into who I support or why or what my general ideas are on the race, but one of the guys had a good snippet of information that I thought should be shared.

Basically, he joined me in condemning both the Republicans and the Democrats for having way too many bullshit artists in their parties crying for “the good of the party.” Oh give me a break, already. You have two major parties who are each worth multiple millions of dollars and these bastards dare to cry that something has to be done for the good of their party? What about what really matters? What about the fundamental battle cry of the Founding Fathers?

What about the good of the people!?!?

Wasn’t that the original fundamental charge of our government? To always be for and of the people and to work for the betterment of the people? If the Founding Fathers were around today…they’d be sick with our current two-party system – just like the majority of Americans are.

You see, this is what disenfranchises many people from getting involved in politics or from even voting. Who wants to support a two-headed monster that is supposedly by and for the people, but so over-concerned with their own petty agendas that they forget about the vast majority of Americans? I sure as hell don’t. You have one party that believes in assuaging the rich in hopes of their helping the poor and one party who believes in stealing from the rich to give to the poor.

What about the overwhelming majority of Americans who are neither poor nor rich? What about those of us who just “get along” and live somewhat comfortably from paycheck to paycheck? Are we lost in the mix?

But in the end, I know that just having the right to vote is extremely valuable, so I will certainly exercise that right. And I will be voting for the person who I believe will do the best job in the White House – no the one who it is fashionable to hate or the one who has the least amount of garbage talked about him. I just wish that my vote was going to a strong third party (not the bullshit laden Greens, Reforms, or Libertarians) who didn’t care about the good of their party, but rather about the good of the people.

The Great Disconnect

Monday, April 26th, 2004

Isn’t it sad that your political leaders don’t know what YOU think?

I’m not saying that the Republicans are idiots or that the Democrats are idiots – I’m saying that EVERYONE is an idiot!

Those guys in charge are morons for not listening to the will of the people, and we the people aren’t as sharp as we should be – because we accept this practice from our leaders.

This is our country – and we the people need to take it back and let our voices be heard!


© 1996 - 2010 Usable Web Solutions, LLC
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

All content is exclusive to this site and may be reprinted only with express written permission of the Owner of this site.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us