<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JerseySmarts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jerseysmarts.com/tag/third-party-candidates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com</link>
	<description>Joe Palazzolo&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 04:25:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Sizing Up the Constitution Party</title>
		<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/11/13/sizing-up-the-constitution-party/</link>
					<comments>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/11/13/sizing-up-the-constitution-party/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[The State of New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Declaration Of Independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jerseysmarts.com/?p=521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of my favorite things to do during Presidential election years is to research third party candidates and learn more about third parties in general. In 2004, I began to look a little bit at the Libertarian Party. This year, I&#8217;m looking at the Constitution Party. This is a political party that was originally formed [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my favorite things to do during Presidential election years is to research third party candidates and learn more about third parties in general.  In 2004, I began to look a little bit at the Libertarian Party.  This year, I&#8217;m looking at <a href="http://www.constitutionparty.com/"><strong>the Constitution Party</strong></a>.  This is a political party that was originally formed as the United States Taxpayer&#8217;s party in 1992.  The purpose of that party was to limit the federal government&#8217;s ability to tax and reign in federal spending.  After a few years they decided to change their name to the Constitution Party because they felt the new name better reflected the organization&#8217;s direction.  From their website:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Constitution Party strongly champions the principles of government laid down by our Founding Fathers in the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution, principles which have been abandoned by our political establishment. Unlike other political organizations, we do not believe these principles are outdated. We recognize that the Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the land and must be enforced.</p></blockquote>
<p>As you can see, this is a party that is strongly in favor of states&#8217; rights and restoring the Constitution to its proper place as the pinnacle of American democracy.  That may be hard to do in today&#8217;s society since so many of today&#8217;s common thoughts (i.e. equality of all peoples) are not specifically cited in the Constitution.  Of course it would only take a normal person to realize that the Constitution implies equality for all people, but who wants to get bogged down in that type of argument?  More from their website:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Seven Principles of the Constitution Party are:</strong><br />
1. Life: For all human beings, from conception to natural death;</p>
<p>2. Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions for the self-governed individual;</p>
<p>3. Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted;</p>
<p>4. Property: Each individual&#8217;s right to own and steward personal property without government burden;</p>
<p>5. Constitution: and Bill of Rights interpreted according to the actual intent of the Founding Fathers;</p>
<p>6. States&#8217; Rights: Everything not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government is reserved for the state and local jurisdictions;</p>
<p>7. American Sovereignty: American government committed to the protection of the borders, trade, and common defense of Americans, and not entangled in foreign alliances.</p></blockquote>
<p>There you have the states&#8217; rights listed as point number 6.  I&#8217;m actually a big fan of point number 7 regarding American sovereignty.  No, I&#8217;m not an isolationist, but I think it&#8217;s time our troops leave Japan and Germany&#8230;  We could use their expertise, knowledge, and sheer manpower in other areas of the world (like Afghanistan) or right here in our own country!  We forget that not only do we have the most powerful army in the world, we have the most intelligent.  America could use that intelligence within our own borders.</p>
<p>The first two points and the fourth one are pretty much a statement of what all Americans are looking for in their federal government.  No controversies there.  The third point seems to be one that the majority of Americans agree with, but not the folks in certain areas of the country.  Definitely not going to get a Constitution Party Mayor in San Francisco any time soon!  Point 5 can become dicey as the intent of the Founders can be interpreted in a few different ways.  I would assume that the Constitutionalists would be in favor of a rigid interpretation of the Founders&#8217; intent.  In some cases that might not be such a bad thing.</p>
<p>I joined the Constitution Party mailing list and added a link to their national party and <a href="http://www.constitutionparty-nj.org/"><strong>their New Jersey state party</strong></a> to the links on the side of this blog.  Like I said earlier, I always like keeping up with what third parties are up to &#8211; this country needs a third party to emerge as a real contender!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/11/13/sizing-up-the-constitution-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul Plans Alternative Rally</title>
		<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/07/26/ron-paul-plans-alternative-rally/</link>
					<comments>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/07/26/ron-paul-plans-alternative-rally/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 13:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[United States Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack H. Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Third Party Candidates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thebalrogslair.com/2008/07/26/ron-paul-plans-alternative-rally/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Failed Presidential candidate Ron Paul has planned an alternative rally to the Republican National Convention. Paul&#8217;s rally, to be held at the Target Center in Minneapolis, is supposed to focus on his message of limited government (of which I am a fan). It&#8217;s a shame that Congressman Paul&#8217;s campaign was neglected by the major networks. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Failed Presidential candidate <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-07-25-paul-rally_N.htm"><strong>Ron Paul has planned an alternative rally</strong></a> to the Republican National Convention.  Paul&#8217;s rally, to be held at the Target Center in Minneapolis, is supposed to focus on his message of limited government (of which I am a fan).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a shame that Congressman Paul&#8217;s campaign was neglected by the major networks.  The media has really shaped the current Presidential campaign and it&#8217;s disgusting.  Any American out there who is looking for real &#8220;change&#8221; isn&#8217;t even allowed to hear different opinions by the American media.  How many of the major media conglomerates are allowing the Libertarian or Green Party to join the debates?  FOX isn&#8217;t.  CNN isn&#8217;t.  CBS isn&#8217;t.  ABC isn&#8217;t.  MSNBC isn&#8217;t.  Speaking of NBC &#8211; I can barely watch their programming any more as their entire schedule of programming is so one-sided in favor of Obama that it might as well be funded out of the Obama campaign!</p>
<p>I know these media companies stick to some format that requires X% of the national polls to be in favor of your campaign, but they know that American masses are mostly sheep and vote for either R or D.  Why not change your debate regulations to reflect the fact that there needs to be more than two views of how to move forward?  Why not have regulations that allow the four political parties with the highest polling to be involved in the debate?  If the Republicans get 44% and the Democrats get 44%, then the media should look to that remaining 12% of the opinion polls to see which third party candidates people are supporting.</p>
<p>All I know is that for a Republican and a Democrat to run around America saying &#8220;Change, change, change,&#8221; is completely ridiculous.  What&#8217;s the definition of insanity?  Always doing the same thing and expecting a different result.  So America &#8211; keep voting Republican and Democrat and see if you get a different result&#8230;lunatics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2008/07/26/ron-paul-plans-alternative-rally/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
