<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JerseySmarts.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.jerseysmarts.com/tag/pixar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com</link>
	<description>Joe Palazzolo&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 03:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Playing Stocks in a Turbulent Market</title>
		<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2009/03/24/playing-stocks-in-a-turbulent-market/</link>
					<comments>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2009/03/24/playing-stocks-in-a-turbulent-market/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Money, Jobs, & Finances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roommates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jerseysmarts.com/?p=3174</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since November I&#8217;ve been playing in the stock market trying to hit some small jackpots in the &#8220;penny stock&#8221; department (penny stocks are those that trade for anywhere from a few pennies up through a few bucks). I&#8217;ve actually been doing pretty good except for losing a few bucks in an ill-timed investment in General [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since November I&#8217;ve been playing in the stock market trying to hit some small jackpots in the &#8220;penny stock&#8221; department (penny stocks are those that trade for anywhere from a few pennies up through a few bucks).  I&#8217;ve actually been doing pretty good except for losing a few bucks in an ill-timed investment in General Motors (thank you, GGL).  Anyway, I thought I would give a brief update of where I&#8217;m at with my investing and which stocks seem to be &#8220;doing it&#8221; for me.</p>
<p>I made a few bucks buying Bank of America last week and Barnes and Noble in December and January, but the real winner for me has been <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000I2HAVW?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=usableweb07-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=9325&#038;creativeASIN=B000I2HAVW"><strong>Sirius XM</strong></a><img decoding="async" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=usableweb07-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000I2HAVW" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> satellite radio.  I bought this stock (a LOT of this stock) when it was ranging between 11 cents and 16 cents.  Less than 2,000 shares overall, but still a decent amount.  Today the stock closed at 35.7 cents a share so I&#8217;m doubling some of my money and tripling some other money.  My only regret with this stock is that I didn&#8217;t go &#8220;all in&#8221; when it hit 5 cents a few months ago.  Just think, if you invested $1,000 in the stock when it was 5 cents, your share would be worth over $7,000 right now!</p>
<p>Anyway, no point in crying over spilled milk &#8211; especially when I&#8217;m still up 163% on my initial investment in the company!  Ford has also been a winner for both me and one of my roommates who decided to invest in it.  And Alcoa (an aluminum making company) has provided more than a 30% increase in the last week.</p>
<p>Now that I&#8217;ve dropped GM completely the only negative returns that I have in my portfolio are Martha Stewart Omnimedia and THQ, Inc.  Omnimedia is the parent company for all of Martha Stewart&#8217;s various subsidiaries (and Emeril Lagasse, too).  I think this stock is poised for major growth in the coming 12 &#8211; 18 months and buying it right now at $2.31 per share might pay big dividends in the future.</p>
<p>As for THQ, Inc., this is the video game company behind the wildly successful WCW/nWo and WWE video games.  They also have the rights for Disney/Pixar video games, too.  I think this is another company that has a good long-term earnings potential ahead of it and it&#8217;s one that I just bought heavily into (in my world, heavily is a hundred bucks or so!).</p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d share&#8230;and see if anyone has any decent stock tips out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2009/03/24/playing-stocks-in-a-turbulent-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Movie Review:  Cars</title>
		<link>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2006/06/11/movie-review-cars/</link>
					<comments>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2006/06/11/movie-review-cars/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 14:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Book, DVD, Movie, & Media Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next Iteration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pixar]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.thebalrogslair.com/archives/431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed Disney/Pixar&#8217;s latest offering. Cars is, of course, marketed as a kid&#8217;s movie and when one of my roommates and I went to go see it, the place was overrun with rugrats. This was actually not that bad as he and I could have a full-blown conversation in the middle of the movie [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed Disney/Pixar&#8217;s latest offering.  Cars is, of course, marketed as a kid&#8217;s movie and when one of my roommates and I went to go see it, the place was overrun with rugrats.  This was actually not that bad as he and I could have a full-blown conversation in the middle of the movie without really being out of place!</p>
<p>Anyone who knows anything about Pixar knows that they are the absolute best in terms of rendering almost life-like three-dimensional images on screen.  Cars is no exception.  The movie looks phenomenal, literally.  From Lightning&#8217;s (Owen Wilson) flashy shine to Doc&#8217;s (Paul Newman&#8217;s) rebuffed exterior towards the end of the movie, the designers did a masterful job of putting together a tremendous looking piece of work.  And the landscapes are awe-inspiring, albeit digitally rendered.</p>
<p>While I highly recommend this movie and I will probably go back to see it if I can catch a $5 matinee somewhere, I did have one major problem with the core of the story.  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m giving anything away by saying that Owen Wilson&#8217;s character winds up in extremely small-town America which consists of one-street&#8217;s worth of a previously bustling tourist area.  Well, the &#8220;story&#8221; is that with the creation of the interstate, Route 66 (the home of Radiator Springs, the dead tourist town) is not used too much any longer.  The implication?  The mini-tourist towns along Route 66 are decimated by people buzzing by on the highway instead of passing through their tourism-fueled towns.</p>
<p>Sad and true story.</p>
<p>But something just rubbed me the wrong way about the Disney Corporation making a movie that pretty much scolds the public for neglecting Middle American tourist spots.  Isn&#8217;t this the same company that all but killed the Heartland tourism industry by putting two mega popular theme parks in Florida and California?  And weren&#8217;t highways built, in part, to facilitate mass transportation to and from these places?  I also think that it&#8217;s quite ironic that people will take these highways and continue to pass these small former tourist areas in order to go to these theme parks so they can see rides and attractions about this movie&#8230;</p>
<p>And as far as complaining about the fast-paced lives of today, I have a problem with the company who owns ESPN bitching about this.  Let&#8217;s not forget that ESPN just introduced their own mobile phone brand that gives you even more sports-on-demand options than the standard mobile phone sports service&#8230; because sometimes you JUST have to know what your favorite baseball player&#8217;s batting average was when he was in high school&#8230;</p>
<p>Those points aside, I thought the movie was great.  The graphics rocked, the story was good, and the plot moved along well.  The actors all did a great job with their voiceovers and I highly suggest going to see this movie &#8211; especially if you have rugrats that you need to entertain!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.jerseysmarts.com/2006/06/11/movie-review-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
