Posts Tagged ‘George W. Bush’

President Obama’s First Evening Press Conference

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

President Barack Obama had his first primetime press conference last night. If you watched, I wonder if you saw as interesting an event as I saw… Ha ha ha! Honestly, that press conference would have been off of my television if FOX had its normal Monday night line-up on!

Really, President Obama needs to liven things up a bit. We’re looking for change from him, not the same old boring “what the hell is he talking about?” crap! I will say, though, that it was nice to watch the President of the United States and not have to worry about him saying something that made absolutely no sense. On the other hand, while the rest of country goes crazy over Obama’s speaking style, I really, really hate it. I know that the biased liberal media will never publish a negative thing about his speaking style, but this man relies on “ehhh” and “ihhh” WAY too much when he talks. Go back and listen to the entire speech (if you can stomach it) and try to count how many times he interjects “ehhh” and “ihhh” in a single sentence. It’s alarming.

Again, the alternative could be, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice…you can’t fool me twice.” Good grief.

But even as I take my own potshot at President George W. Bush, I have to say that it was a little gross that Obama cited the federal leadership of the last eight years as the reason for the current economic downturn. Look, I agree with the rest of the gang that the folks running the world down in Washington were a little goofed up, but that includes the Democrats, too. Further, the biggest perpetrators of our current problems were the greedy people on Wall Street and the ignorant people on Main Street. The root of this downturn is the devastated housing market. The root of the devastated housing market are people who were buying $500,000 homes when they could only afford $150,000 homes. The side-root of that same problem were the bankers who gave mortgages to people who couldn’t afford their homes!

Ugh…it’s not all about Bush! I had hoped that Obama would bring this country past the Bush derangement syndrome, but after his campaign-style speech last night, I guess that real change hasn’t come…yet.

Working Out is Okay for Barack…but not Bush

Saturday, January 3rd, 2009

Special thanks goes out to GGL for bringing this story to my attention. Last week on Philly.com there was a story talking about how President-Elect Barack Obama makes time to work out during his transition period. This is just a small clip from the article, but it sets the stage for the end of this entry…

He’s not in the White House yet, but gone are the hours he once spent reading novels, watching television, and obsessing over the daily transactions of Chicago’s sports teams. He eats out only once every few weeks.

But one habit endures: Obama has gone to the gym, for about 90 minutes a day, for dozens of days in a row. He has always treated exercise less as recreation than as requirement, but his devotion has intensified in the last few months.

Personally, I’m glad that Obama is going to the gym because I think the image of a young, fit President is also part of what Americans need right now. Our young people need a national role model that exhibits integrity and healthy behavior, both of which Obama has to offer. However, on the “comments” section of this particular Philly.com article there was an interest note. Here is the full text of that comment:

A former WP writer named Jonathan Chait said this of GW Bush’s workouts in an opinion piece for the LA Times headlined, “The (over)exercise of power.” Recounting how President Bush ran 3.5 miles a day and preached more cross-training to a federal judge, Chait fumed, “Am I the only person who finds this disturbing? … What I mean is the fact that Bush has an obsession with exercise that borders on the creepy.” So Bush working out was “creepy” and B Hussein working out is defined as, “The sun glinted off chiseled pectorals sculpted during four weightlifting sessions each week, and a body toned by regular treadmill runs and basketball games.” Nice to see the in the tank media hasn’t lost its ‘touch’ and can be counted on to do puff piece after puff piece on the messiah, B Hussein Obama. 2008-The Year Journalism Died.

Now the guy who posted this comment may have a bias against Obama, but he brings up a good point. With the help of Google, I went out and found that Los Angeles Times column where Chait went after after President Bush regarding his workout habits. Here’s a piece of it for you:

Given the importance of his job, it is astonishing how much time Bush has to exercise. His full schedule is not publicly available. The few peeks we get at Bush’s daily routine usually come when some sort of disaster prods the White House Press Office to reveal what the president was doing “at the time.” Earlier this year, an airplane wandered into restricted Washington air space. Bush, we learned, was bicycling in Maryland. In 2001, a gunman fired shots at the White House. Bush was inside exercising. When planes struck the World Trade Center in 2001, Bush was reading to schoolchildren, but that morning he had gone for a long run with a reporter. Either this is a series of coincidences or Bush spends an enormous amount of time working out.

The story gets a little bit more interesting when you put all of these pieces together, huh? I agree with the commenter when he says that 2008 was the year that journalism died. Between the destruction of both Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin in the media and the utter love affair that the mainstream media had with Obama during the election, could this gym story be the dot on the exclamation point declaring the end of the mainstream media as we know it?

An Update on the 2008 Election Turnout

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

A few weeks ago (right after the election) I wrote an entry talking about how voter turnout for the Presidential election was actually lower in 2008 than it was back in 2004. Well, there are some updated numbers out from RealClearPolitics.com and Wikipedia that show a much higher voter turnout in 2008. Here are some updated statistics regarding the 2008 Presidential election:

  • Senator Barack Obama received 52.92% of the popular vote while Senator John McCain received 45.67% of the popular vote. This compares to 2004 when President George Bush received 50.74% of the popular vote while Senator John Kerry received 48.27% of the popular vote.
  • In terms of the total vote count, Obama received 69,456,884 votes while McCain received 59,934,813 votes. This is remarkable because Obama won this election by about 9 and a half million votes. For comparison’s sake, Bush received 62,040,610 votes in 2004 while Kerry received 59,028,444 votes.
  • In total, there were 131,237,589 votes cast in 2008 versus 122,267,553 votes cast in 2004. This represents an increase of 8,970,036 votes in 2008 than in 2004.
  • The total voter turnout as a percentage of eligible voters was approximately 63%. This percentage is the highest voter turnout since 1960, when 64.8% of eligible voters turned out.
  • The increased “youth” vote only represented one additional percentage point in the overall voter turnout. In other words, the youth vote increased by only 1,312,376 votes – certainly not the huge bump that everyone expected

So there is an updated look at the 2008 voter turnout in comparison to the 2004 voter turnout. The 2008 was still an historic election and there was a giant leap in voter turnout, but it is worth mentioning that the youth turnout was not as big as was expected – further proving that just because far-left, anti-war, anti-Bush college students received increased coverage during this election season by a liberal national media, their groundswell of activism does not adequately represent the feelings of their peers. That might be the most interesting piece of information coming out of the 2008 election…

What the Presidential Election Does NOT Need

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

The talking heads on television keep telling us how historic this election is in that we have the first black nominee (presumptive though he may be at this point) and the oldest person to run for a first term as President. Obviously Obama’s campaign is more historic that McCain’s campaign so I think the future will remember this as the Obama election – whether he wins or loses.

With such an historic campaign there are a few things that we do NOT need this time around. First and foremost, I get physically ill every time I hear Barack Obama say that John McCain is running for George Bush’s third term. What a disgusting catchphase to use in this “historic” election! John McCain is John McCain. George Bush is George Bush. John McCain is running for his first term. Obama’s comparison of John McCain to George Bush is obviously rooted in politics and polls since most of the nation is sick of Bush at this point and the Obama team is trying to capitalize on that disgust. THIS is the new politics that Obama promised? Count me out, thank you. As soon as I heard these words come out of Obama’s mouth, I immediately shut off my brain from listening to any other drivel come out of this man.

But lo and behold the brain trust running McCain’s campaign goes out and tells McCain to say that Obama is running for Jimmy Carter’s second term! Good grief! Is this the John McCain that ran as a maverick politician in 2000 and has based his entire political career off of doing what he believed was right over what his political party believed was right? THIS is what I can expect from John McCain going forward? No thanks. At this point, you can count me out. This is NOT the new politics that these men promised America and I urge everyone else who wants true change to withdraw support from either candidate until they stop throwing this type of mud.

The disguised shots at McCain’s age and the pathetic shots at Obama’s personal advisors are all too much to bear. I encourage everyone to start exploring third party candidates if they are really looking for change this year. For starters, go and take a look at Bob Barr – the Libertarian Party candidate.

Change doesn’t mean voting for the same party or a candidate with flowery speeches, folks. Change means using YOUR vote to make a REAL change in America.

Truth

Thursday, July 24th, 2003

One of our forums dwellers recently wrote a post that I responded to with a pretty long post of my own. He mentioned some thing about the current political world and I responded with my views. However, as it turns out, I think that I’ve struck a chord that many of you might agree with. Let me explain.

First, though I do agree with the Republicans on just about everything that they do these days, I find it hard to stand staunchly behind them. It’s not because of any of the recent media stories or anything like that, but rather because of my own personal ideology. And that is what I want to express in this article – what makes me stand apart from the current political landscape. I have a feeling that many of you are going to agree with my notions.

I’ve figured out where I stand. I think that I stand on the side of truth and common sense. And sadly, neither one of our major political parties seem to exude this quality all the time in the everything that they do. I will say that in my view, the Republicans have had more common sense lately and the Democrats have had more ridiculousness – but that’s nothing for either of the two to be happy about.

You see, I look at the current “scandal” over the State of the Union address as a damn joke. The President said, “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”

Now I said this in the forums and I’ll say it again – that statement is 100% correct. And for those of you who are on the left side of the spectrum, you should know that Bill Clinton even came out and said that it was a mistake for that statement to be in the Address itself, but that it was true. Prime Minister Blair even came across the pond to say that it was a true statement.

I believe that the problem arises in perception. Those who are in my shoes see no problem with the argument because it, in its logical form, is valid. However, the content of the statement may ultimately prove to the statement itself as false (anyone who has taken Logic in college knows what I’m talking about). To make it quite simple – the British may or may not be correct, but the assertion that the British had that information is completely correct.

So from my view point, I see a 16 word phrase that some Democrats have called a lie and that assertion (that the 16 words are a lie) is in ITSELF a lie! And that is what bothers me about the current Democratic landscape – there are too many people going out of their way to skew the truth in order to make their arguments seem more valid.

Why not try common sense?

Arguably one of the greatest Presidents of all time, Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt, saw a great problem in America – the Great Depression. He used common sense and led us out of it. Sure, the second World War had much to do with the restoration of the union, but it was his ideas and his insight that led us there.

In the same vein, one of the greatest Presidents of our modern era was Democrat Lyndon B. Johnson. Yeah, many people unjustly give him the blame for Vietnam and other social issues of the time, but he saw that there was poverty in America and he did everything in his power to fight it. I bet that none of you (or very few of you) know that President Johnson passed more social reforms than even Roosevelt during the Depression! This was a man that wanted to help every single American. Sadly, this was a man that embodied the last true virtues of Democratic ideology.

The roles have been reversed these days. The Republicans are the ones who now “get it” and understand the needs of the people at large. For those of you who don’t believe it, just look at the Republican Revolution going on in the political landscape of our country. Have any of you seen the map of the counties that voted for Bush as opposed to those who voted for Gore? It’s something else…well over 90% of the map of the US voted for Bush.

Ultimately, I could give two shits about all of that. I want the truth. I started watching Bill O’Reilly during the big 9/11 charity debacle and he was telling the truth and didn’t allow other people to not tell the truth. And during last year while I was taking political science as a minor, I studied Susan Estrich who did the same thing, but who was a Democrat! My God! It was bliss!

Finally, two people who don’t bullshit and tell it like it is on either side of the political spectrum. This is what I want. This is what I believe the majority of the American people want. We want no nonsense leaders who will tell us how it is, up and down the line. I want something refreshing – like a President who will say that we are going to be in a war that will see us lose many men and not be over shortly, but still wind up saving our civilization. George Bush gave me that after September 11th and I still believe that what he said is correct. Iraq is a part of the War on Terror, North Korea is a part of it, the Taliban was a part of it, and the Iranian and Syrian governments have become an increasingly larger part of it.

And no pundit can take those ideas away from me. No politician can change my mind with a pretty slogan or campaign ad. No one will be able to twist the truth in my mind. Those ideas are what I’ve seen with my eyes. Those are the ideas that I’ve heard from the overwhelming majority of the people who would know – the soldiers I’ve spoken with, the politicians I’ve spoken with, and the veterans that I’ve spoken with.

It’s the truth. And that’s all I really want. I want the truth and common sense.

Is there anything wrong with that?

(Originally published as a Balrog Babblings article)


© 1996 - 2010 Usable Web Solutions, LLC
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

All content is exclusive to this site and may be reprinted only with express written permission of the Owner of this site.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us