Posts Tagged ‘Economic Crisis’

Will the Economic Crisis Affect Fraternity Membership?

Monday, April 13th, 2009

Back when I was the advisor for my local chapter of Sigma Pi Fraternity, I signed up to be on a listserv for fraternity and sorority news. Every once in a while I get an e-mail with an article attached to it talking about something in the fraternity world (and since the media is sensationalistic these days, the articles are generally filled with bad news).

A few weeks ago, though, an article was sent out that talked about why some students are choosing to go Greek these days and why others aren’t. One paragraph, in particular, stuck with me:

The current economic crisis has changed the way students think about money, and Fouts acknowledges that perceptions about fraternity and sorority dues are no different. Chapters and student affairs offices, she said, will have to be “line-item specific” as to what these dues are for and how they will be spent to the benefit of the student. She argued that interested students should not be brought to think of their funds as “paying for friends,” as many an old cliché of fraternity life states.

Let me offer some comments. First, joining a fraternity is not paying for your friends any more than paying to go away to college is paying for a new social network or that joining any other organization that requires annual dues is paying for your friends. That’s a tired ass old argument that is so fundamentally flawed in both its view and application that it’s not even worth getting into extreme details here.

Second, I hope that students WILL begin to question where their dues are being applied – both locally and nationally. When I became the President of my local chapter many, many years ago one of the first things that I did was review where our money was flowing…and it wasn’t pretty. We were robbing one group of guys to pay for the next group of guys and creating a ridiculous cycle while accruing a massive amount of debt (it peaked at $9,000+ at one point). It was horrible. The guys who came before me either knew about the problem and didn’t fix it or didn’t know how to dig our chapter out of the hole.

To make a long story short, in the two years that I was in charge, we paid off the entire debt and reorganized our accounts in a more professional manner. Things went from very bad to very good (a little self-promotion, why not?).

When I began as a volunteer and began to dig more into where the money was going at the national level, while I understood the immediate needs and uses of the funds (which were all being used in a responsible manner), I began to worry about the future. My main concern was not with today’s financial issues, but with the financial issues of 2020 and 2050. With that in mind, I changed my main set of volunteer activities from assisting undergraduates (which is a lot of fun and the most rewarding experience in the fraternity) to focusing on how to build the financial future of our fraternity.

Can fraternities and sororities survive the current economic crisis? Yes – if they prove their worth. Fraternities and sororities need to be prepared to show the value that a new member gets for their dollars. If that “benefit” or value is the ability to attend fraternity-only parties, then the fraternity which is selling that product is likely going to find itself in dire straits. Any college student knows that there is always a party if they know where to look. Fraternity and sorority membership should provide lifelong benefits such as a built-in professional network and a built-in emotional support system.

Those fraternities that can prove their worth in the current economic climate will not only survive, but I expect them to thrive.

What’s Worse? Getting Laid Off or Cut Back?

Monday, December 29th, 2008

What’s worse? Getting laid off from your job or being forced to take a pay cut as well as unpaid time off? This is the predicament that some employees are facing around the country as the economic crisis continues to waffle its way through the American workforce. The New York Times ran an article on this issue last week – below is an interesting piece from that article:

A growing number of employers, hoping to avoid or limit layoffs, are introducing four-day workweeks, unpaid vacations and voluntary or enforced furloughs, along with wage freezes, pension cuts and flexible work schedules. These employers are still cutting labor costs, but hanging onto the labor.

And in some cases, workers are even buying in. Witness the unusual suggestion made in early December by the chairman of the faculty senate at Brandeis University, who proposed that the school’s 300 professors and instructors give up 1 percent of their pay.

How about that, huh? You have professors willingly giving up 1% of their pay so that their colleagues at the university will not be fired. That’s pretty impressive if you ask me. The article goes on to talk about how about 30% of the professors have opted into this program and it will generate some $100,000 in savings – enough to save the jobs of “several” university employees.

What is interesting here is that unlike in previous economic downturns and recessions, there are some companies that do not want to cut their existing staff because they know that cutting staff will lose talent. You have to believe that at this point in history, if companies were employing people who were inefficient at their jobs then they would have already been fired. So what’s an employer to do when they need to save money but don’t want to fire anyone?

Send their employees home.

This puts the employee in an awkward predicament. Do you stay with a job that is finding ways to literally nickel and dime you out of a few percentage points on your annual salary or do you look for greener pastures? My stance would be to do both. If your job is sending you home once a week and forcing you in to extended, unpaid furloughs, then you should use that time to find a new place to work, if possible. Look, your job is already telling you that they value you as an employee and that they don’t want to lose you by virtue of your continued employment. If, however, you feel that the reduction in pay is not going to work for your financial needs, then you may as well use the new free time to play the field a bit.

Is Anyone Really Surprised at this News?

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

On Sunday, the CBS News website reported that some $1.6 Billion of the October bailout money was spent on bonuses, stock options, and country club memberships. Some information on this disgusting abuse of taxpayer dollars straight from the article:

The rewards came even at banks where poor results last year foretold the economic crisis that sent them to Washington for a government rescue. Some trimmed their executive compensation due to lagging bank performance, but still forked over multimillion-dollar executive pay packages.

Benefits included cash bonuses, stock options, personal use of company jets and chauffeurs, home security, country club memberships and professional money management, the AP review of federal securities documents found.

The total amount given to nearly 600 executives would cover bailout costs for many of the 116 banks that have so far accepted tax dollars to boost their bottom lines.

Seriously, is anyone surprised by this information? A few months ago I suggested that the bailout would be doomed. Anyone could have seen this coming. Who in their right mind would trust the government with such a gigantic dollar amount? It’s insane. Did everyone forget that this is the government?!

The better way to have used that bailout money would have been to give each American a stipend a la the Bush stimulus check from last spring. Why would this have been a better use of the money? Because regular citizens know where they need financial assistance and how best to spend their tax dollars. When you leave the doling out of $350 billion (only half of the $700 billion bailout has been deployed) to the government, you’re essentially asking for the whole thing to go to shit.

And it has. Great!


© 1996 - 2010 Usable Web Solutions, LLC
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

All content is exclusive to this site and may be reprinted only with express written permission of the Owner of this site.
Privacy Policy | Contact Us